Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
2.
Vaccine ; 42(3): 441-447, 2024 01 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38184391

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Building on a Canadian study associating unvaccinated individuals to increased car accidents, we examined the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination status and US preventive care practices. METHODS: We queried the 2021 National Health Interview Survey. First, we fitted a model to identify respondent-level factors associated with receipt of at least one COVID-19 vaccination. Second, we fitted a survey-weighted logistic regression model adjusted for respondent-level characteristics to examine whether the receipt of at least one COVID-19 vaccination predicted the receipt of preventive care services. Preventive care services assessed included serum cholesterol, glucose, and blood pressure measurements, as well as guideline-concordant cancer screening including breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening. RESULTS: Factors predicting receipt of COVID-19 vaccination were age (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 1.03; 95 % confidence interval (CI) [1.03-1.03]), Hispanic (aOR 1.25; 95 % CI [1.08-1.44]), and non-Hispanic Asian (aOR 3.52; 95 % CI [2.74-4.52]) ethnicity/race, and history of cancer (aOR 1.61; 95 % CI [1.13-2.30]). Unvaccinated respondents were less likely to have received serum cholesterol (aOR 0.69; 95 % CI [0.50-0.70), serum glucose (aOR 0.65; 95 % CI [0.56-0.75]), or blood pressure measurements (aOR 0.47; 95 % CI [0.33-0.66]); and were less likely to have received breast cancer (aOR 0.35; 95 % CI [0.25-0.48]), colorectal cancer (aOR 0.52; 95 % CI [0.46-0.60]) and prostate cancer screening (aOR 0.61; 95 % CI [0.48-0.76]). There was no significant association between unvaccinated respondents receiving cervical cancer screening (aOR 0.96; 95 % CI [0.81-1.13]; p = 0.616). CONCLUSION: Non-receipt of COVID-19 vaccination was associated with non-receipt of preventive care services including cancer screening. Further studies are needed to assess if this association is due to system-level factors or reflects a general distrust of medical preventive care amongst this population.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias da Próstata , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Pandemias , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Canadá , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Glucose , Colesterol
3.
Mol Cancer ; 23(1): 8, 2024 01 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38195534

RESUMO

Treatment for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has improved dramatically over the last decade, shifting from high-dose cytokine therapy in combination with surgical resection of tumors to targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and combination therapies. However, curative treatment, particularly for advanced-stage disease, remains rare. Cell therapy as a "living drug" has achieved hematological malignancy cures with a high response rate, and significant research efforts have been made to facilitate its translation to solid tumors. Herein, we overview the cellular therapies for RCC focusing on allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, T cell receptor gene-modified T cells, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, CAR natural killer (NK) cells, lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells, γδ T cells, and dendritic cell vaccination. We have also included perspectives for using other recent approaches, such as CAR macrophages, dendritic cell-cytokine induced killer cells and regulatory CAR-T cells to shed light on preclinical development of cell therapy and advancing cell therapy into clinic to achieve cures for RCC.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/terapia , Imunoterapia , Terapia Baseada em Transplante de Células e Tecidos , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias Renais/terapia
4.
Eur Urol Oncol ; 7(1): 147-150, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37487813

RESUMO

Stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) for renal cell carcinoma may result in more precise treatment delivery through the capabilities for improved image quality, daily adaptive planning, and accounting for respiratory motion during treatment with real-time MR tracking. In this study, we aimed to characterize the safety and feasibility of SMART for localized kidney cancer. Twenty patients with localized kidney cancer (ten treated in a prospective phase 1 trial and ten in the supplemental cohort) were treated to 40 Gy in five fractions on a 0.35 T MR-guided linear accelerator with daily adaptive planning and a cine MR-guided inspiratory breath hold technique. The median follow-up time was 17 mo (interquartile range: 13-20 months). A single patient developed local failure at 30 mo. No grade ≥3 adverse events were reported. The mean decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate was -1.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95% confidence interval or CI [-6.6 to 3.1 ml/min/1.73 m2]), and the mean decrease in tumor diameter was -0.20 cm (95% CI [-0.6 to 0.2 cm]) at the last follow-up. Anterior location and overlap of the 25 or 28 Gy isodose line with gastrointestinal organs at risk were predictive of the benefit from online adaptive planning. Kidney SMART is feasible and, at the early time point evaluated in this study, was well tolerated with minimal decline in renal function. More studies are warranted to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique. PATIENT SUMMARY: For patients with localized renal cell carcinoma who are not surgical candidates, stereotactic magnetic resonance--guided adaptive radiotherapy is a feasible and safe noninvasive treatment option that results in minimal impact on kidney function.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Radiocirurgia , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renais/radioterapia , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Neoplasias Renais/radioterapia , Rim , Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética
5.
J Clin Med ; 12(21)2023 Oct 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37959309

RESUMO

Radical cystectomy (RC) is an integral part of the management of patients with advanced-stage bladder cancer. This major oncologic operation is prone to complications resulting in morbidity and mortality. We analyzed the critical steps of open RC, performed an evidence-based review of these steps, and discussed our experience and approach. We conducted a literature review of the open RC technique, identified the critical steps that consistently appeared across different sources, and organized these steps into a framework. PubMed was queried with the critical steps as keywords for relevant articles published from 1 January 2013 to 1 August 2023. We utilized this query to conduct a systematic review of the literature using the outcomes of overall survival and 90-day complication rate. We developed the "Summary for the 10 Critical Operative Steps of Radical Cystectomy", a concise guide to the approach to open RC. When available, an evidence-based analysis of each critical step was performed. We also included additional components of cystectomy optimization such as pre-habilitation in the preoperative phase, standard versus extended lymphadenectomy, the vaginal-sparing approach to female radical cystectomy, patient-reported outcomes following urinary diversion, the use of a mesh for stoma formation, and the use of the ERAS protocol for postoperative care. An evidence-based assessment of RC may help provide valuable information to optimize surgical techniques and patient outcomes.

6.
Urol Oncol ; 41(12): 489.e1-489.e6, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37980224

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) is the standard of care for testicular cancer in various disease settings. Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) complications have been reported to occur in <1% of primary RPLND cases and up to 3% of postchemotherapy (PC-RPLND) cases. While prophylactic anticoagulation (AC) has been well-documented to reduce DVT rates in patients undergoing surgery in general, the benefit of prophylactic AC in RPLND has not been assessed. In this retrospective cohort study, we seek to address this unmet need by evaluating the rates and associated risk factors of DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) with a national and institutional database, assess the changing patterns in DVT prophylaxis with postoperative AC following RPLND, and quantify the potential benefit of prophylactic AC in patients who have undergone RPLND using a risk-stratified approach. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent RPLND during the 10-year period from 2011 to 2021. An institutional database was queried for all patients undergoing RPLND from 2013 to 2022. Patient characteristics and operative outcomes were compared between the NSQIP and the institutional database. The institutional database was stratified by prior oncologic treatment (i.e., primary RPLND vs. PC-RPLND) and outcomes were compared. Postoperative AC rate was determined and trended by year. The use of postoperative AC and PE events were stratified by clinical stage. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) of AC prophylaxis on PE events and the number needed to treat (NNT) with AC prophylaxis to prevent a single PE event was determined. RESULTS: In total, the NSQIP database query resulted in 779 patients and our institutional database query resulted in 188 patients. The rate of DVT and PE was 1.2% and 0.5% vs. 2.1% and 1.6% in the NSQIP and institutional cohort, respectively. The rate of postoperative AC following RPLND in patients from the institutional database increased from 5% in 2013 to 43% in 2022 (P = 0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in complication rates, including bleeding events, chyle leaks, or hospital readmissions amongst patients who were prescribed AC at discharge and those who were not. No stage I patients developed PEs and no stage I patients were prescribed AC. The ARR for AC prophylaxis for development of PE was found to be 0.023 for the clinical stage II and stage III cohorts. The NNT to prevent a single PE with AC was 44 and 43 for the stage II and stage III cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AC appears beneficial with minimal risk of harm after RPLND, especially in patients with higher risk of developing DVT/PE, highlighting the safety and efficacy of this regimen. There was a significant increase in the rate of AC prophylaxis at discharge amongst patients undergoing RPLND in the institutional database from 2013 to 2022. A risk-stratified protocol of postoperative AC following RPLND appears reasonable, and further prospective trials are warranted to formally confirm this recommendation.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas , Neoplasias Testiculares , Masculino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Testiculares/patologia , Espaço Retroperitoneal/patologia , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Neoplasias Embrionárias de Células Germinativas/cirurgia , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia
7.
R I Med J (2013) ; 106(9): 41-45, 2023 Oct 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37768162

RESUMO

Robotic surgery continues to revolutionize the field of urologic surgery, and thus it is crucial that graduating urologic surgery residents demonstrate proficiency with this technology. The large learning curve of utilizing robotic technology limits resident immediate participation in real-life robotic surgery, and skill acquisition is further challenged by variable case volume. Robotic simulation offers an invaluable opportunity for urologic trainees to cultivate strong foundational skills in a non-clinical setting, ultimately leading to both competence and operative confidence. Several different simulation technologies and robotic assessment protocols have been developed and demonstrate validity in several domains. However, despite their demonstrable utility, there is no formal robotic curricula within US urologic surgery residencies. In this article, we will review the current state of robotic simulation training in urologic surgery and highlight the importance of its widespread utilization in urologic surgery residency training programs.


Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Treinamento por Simulação , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/educação , Competência Clínica , Robótica/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/educação , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos , Simulação por Computador , Currículo , Treinamento por Simulação/métodos
8.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 21(6): 694-702, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37558529

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To evaluate effect and outcomes of combination primary immunotherapy (IO) and nephrectomy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with advanced/metastatic RCC who received IO followed by nephrectomy. Primary outcome was Bifecta (negative surgical margins and no 30-day surgical complications). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) following surgery, reduction in tumor/thrombus size, RENAL score, and clinical/pathologic downstaging. Cox regression multivariable analysis was conducted for predictors of Bifecta and PFS. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed PFS, comparing Bifecta and non-Bifecta groups. RESULTS: A total of 56 patients were analyzed (median age 63 years; median follow-up 22.5 months). A total of 40 (71.4%) patients were intermediate IMDC risk. Patients were treated with immunotherapy for median duration of 8.1 months. Immunotherapy resulted in reductions in tumor size (P < .001), thrombus size (P = .02), and RENAL score (P < .001); 38 (67.9%) patients were clinically downstaged on imaging (P < .001) and 25 (44.6%) patients were pathologically downstaged following surgery (P < .001). Bifecta was achieved in 38 (67.9%) patients. Predictors for bifecta achievement included decreasing tumor size (HR 1.08, P = .043) and pathological downstaging (HR 2.13, P = .047). Bifecta (HR 5.65, P = .009), pathologic downstaging (HR 5.15, P = .02), and increasing reduction in tumor size (HR 1.2, P = .007) were associated with improved PFS. Bifecta patients demonstrated improved 2-year PFS (84% vs. 71%, P = .019). CONCLUSIONS: Primary immunotherapy reduced tumor/thrombus size and complexity. Pathologically downstaged patients were more likely to achieve bifecta, and these patients displayed improved 2-year PFS. Our study supports further inquiry in the use of CRN following primary immunotherapy for advanced renal cancer.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Trombose , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Trombose/cirurgia , Imunoterapia
9.
Oncologist ; 2023 Jun 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37368355

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Even though cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) was once the standard of care for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), its role in treatment has not been well analyzed or defined in the era of immunotherapy (IO). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study analyzed pathological outcomes in patients with advanced or metastatic RCC who received IO prior to CN. This was a multi-institutional, retrospective study of patients with advanced or metastatic RCC. Patients were required to receive IO monotherapy or combination therapy prior to radical or partial CN. The primary endpoint assessed surgical pathologic outcomes, including American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging and frequency of downstaging, at the time of surgery. Pathologic outcomes were correlated to clinical variables using a Wald-chi squared test from Cox regression in a multi-variable analysis. Secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR) defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and progression-free survival (PFS), which were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with reported 95% CIs. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients from 9 sites were included. Most patients were male (65%), 81% had clear cell histology, 11% had sarcomatoid differentiation. Overall, 44% of patients experienced pathologic downstaging, and 13% had a complete pathologic response. The ORR immediately prior to nephrectomy was stable disease in 29% of patients, partial response in 63%, progressive disease in 4%, and 4% unknown. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 25.3 months and median PFS was 3.5 years (95% CI, 2.1-4.9). CONCLUSIONS: IO-based interventions prior to CN in patients with advanced or metastatic RCC demonstrates efficacy, with a small fraction of patients showing a complete response. Additional prospective studies are warranted to investigate the role of CN in the modern IO-era.

11.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 109(5): 1232-1242, 2021 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33171199

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) have both shown acceptable outcomes in the treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Minimal data have been published directly comparing rates of biochemical control and toxicity with these 2 modalities. We hypothesize that LDR and SBRT will provide similar rates of biochemical control. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All low- and intermediate-risk patients with prostate cancer treated definitively with SBRT or LDR between 2010 and 2018 were captured. Phoenix definition was used for biochemical failure. Independent t tests were used to compare baseline characteristics, and repeated measure analysis of variance test was used to compare American Urologic Association (AUA) and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) scores between treatment arms over time. Biochemical control was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in acute and late toxicity were assessed via Pearson χ2. RESULTS: In the study, 219 and 118 patients were treated with LDR and SBRT. Median follow-up was 4.3 years (interquartile range, 3.1-6.1). All patients treated with LDR received 125.0 Gy in a single fraction. SBRT consisted of 42.5 Gy in 5 fractions. Five-year biochemical control for LDR versus SBRT was 91.6% versus 97.6% (P = .108). LDR patients had a larger increase in mean AUA scores at 1 month (17.2 vs 10.3, P < .001) and 3 months posttreatment (14.0 vs 9.7, P < .001), and in mean EPIC scores at 1 month (15.7 vs 13.8, P < .001). There was no significant difference between LDR and SBRT in late grade 3 genitourinary toxicity (0.9% vs 2.5%, P = .238); however, LDR had lower rates of late grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity (0.0% vs 2.5%, P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show similar biochemical control and genitourinary toxicity rates at 5 years for both SBRT and LDR, with slightly higher gastrointestinal toxicity with SBRT and higher AUA and EPIC scores with LDR.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Radiocirurgia/métodos , Idoso , Análise de Variância , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Trato Gastrointestinal/efeitos da radiação , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Órgãos em Risco/efeitos da radiação , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Qualidade de Vida , Radiocirurgia/efeitos adversos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Sistema Urogenital/efeitos da radiação
12.
ACS Chem Biol ; 15(6): 1685-1696, 2020 06 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32369697

RESUMO

SWI/SNF (BAF) complexes are a diverse family of ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers produced by combinatorial assembly that are mutated in and thought to contribute to 20% of human cancers and a large number of neurologic diseases. The gene-activating functions of BAF complexes are essential for viability of many cell types, limiting the development of small molecule inhibitors. To circumvent the potential toxicity of SWI/SNF inhibition, we identified small molecules that inhibit the specific repressive function of these complexes but are relatively nontoxic and importantly synergize with ATR inhibitors in killing cancer cells. Our studies suggest an avenue for therapeutic enhancement of ATR/ATM inhibition and provide evidence for chemical synthetic lethality of BAF complexes as a therapeutic strategy in cancer.


Assuntos
Proteínas Mutadas de Ataxia Telangiectasia/antagonistas & inibidores , Montagem e Desmontagem da Cromatina/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias/patologia , Fatores de Transcrição/metabolismo , Ciclo Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Células HCT116 , Humanos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/farmacologia
13.
J Cell Biol ; 218(6): 1943-1957, 2019 06 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31092557

RESUMO

Metastatic prostate cancer commonly presents with targeted, bi-allelic mutations of the PTEN and TP53 tumor suppressor genes. In contrast, however, most candidate tumor suppressors are part of large recurrent hemizygous deletions, such as the common chromosome 16q deletion, which involves the AKT-suppressing phosphatase PHLPP2. Using RapidCaP, a genetically engineered mouse model of Pten/Trp53 mutant metastatic prostate cancer, we found that complete loss of Phlpp2 paradoxically blocks prostate tumor growth and disease progression. Surprisingly, we find that Phlpp2 is essential for supporting Myc, a key driver of lethal prostate cancer. Phlpp2 dephosphorylates threonine-58 of Myc, which renders it a limiting positive regulator of Myc stability. Furthermore, we show that small-molecule inhibitors of PHLPP2 can suppress MYC and kill PTEN mutant cells. Our findings reveal that the frequent hemizygous deletions on chromosome 16q present a druggable vulnerability for targeting MYC protein through PHLPP2 phosphatase inhibitors.


Assuntos
PTEN Fosfo-Hidrolase/fisiologia , Fosfoproteínas Fosfatases/fisiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-myc/química , Bibliotecas de Moléculas Pequenas/farmacologia , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/fisiologia , Animais , Proliferação de Células , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Knockout , Metástase Neoplásica , Fosfoproteínas Fosfatases/antagonistas & inibidores , Fosforilação , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Neoplasias da Próstata/metabolismo , Estabilidade Proteica , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-akt/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-akt/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-myc/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-myc/metabolismo , Transdução de Sinais , Células Tumorais Cultivadas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA